What Drives Trust in Cryptocurrencies? Study Reveals How Ethics and Culture Interact to Influence Trust

Why It Matter

Trust remains the biggest barrier to mainstream cryptocurrency adoption. This study shows that people do not trust crypto simply because of its technology; their ethical beliefs and cultural values play a decisive role.

Key Takeaways

• Users trust cryptocurrencies when they believe the technology enhances their personal freedom and financial well-being.
• Cultural values shape trust differently across countries, with China, Germany, and the US each showing distinct patterns.
• A one-size-fits-all approach will not work: businesses must tailor trust-building strategies to local expectations.
  

Ethics at the Heart of Crypto Trust

Despite the rapid rise of digital assets, public trust remains fragile. Many users still question whether cryptocurrencies are safe, ethical, or reliable. This gap can be addressed by examining how three ethical factors, privacy and cybersecurity, well-being, and liberty, influence trust.

Across China, Germany, and the United States, two elements stand out as universal: users trust cryptocurrencies when they feel the technology improves their financial well-being and preserves their personal freedom. These ethical anchors appear in every trust-building pattern observed across all three countries.

Privacy and cybersecurity also matter. While not universally required, they frequently form a key part of the trust equation, reflecting persistent concerns about hacking, traceability, and data misuse. This is unsurprising given the long history of exchange breaches, wallet thefts, and the misconception that cryptocurrencies are always anonymous. Users may be willing to trust crypto technology, but only when they believe their data and assets are well protected.

Culture Shapes Trust – but Not in the Same Way Everywhere

Trust in cryptocurrencies is not driven by technology alone. Cultural values, such as attitudes towards hierarchy, individualism, uncertainty, and long-term planning, subtly influence how people assess risk, credibility, and control.

The study finds clear differences across countries:

China: Chinese users show strong trust when cryptocurrencies align with individual autonomy and long-term planning. This signals a shift from traditional collectivist norms, reflecting growing individualism in younger and urban populations. Privacy and cybersecurity also play crucial roles, influenced by widespread concerns about surveillance and data control.

Germany: German users value predictability and future stability, making uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientation central to trust. They are more likely to trust cryptocurrencies when platforms demonstrate strong security measures, compliance, and reliability. Privacy remains important, consistent with Germany’s strong data protection culture.

United States: In the US, no single cultural dimension is required for trust — users rely primarily on ethical considerations such as liberty, autonomy, and financial benefit. Trust often emerges from personal motivations: technological curiosity, investment appetite, or ideological support for decentralisation. Individualism, masculinity, and indulgence appear frequently, suggesting that many American users value self-direction, achievement, and lifestyle flexibility in their crypto use.

Different Paths, Same Outcome: Multiple Ways to Trust Crypto

A key insight from the analysis is equifinality, the idea that people from different countries can arrive at high trust through entirely different combinations of ethics and cultural values.

Examples include:

• Chinese users combining privacy protection, future orientation, and personal autonomy.
• German users situating trust in secure, rule-based systems with clear long-term benefits.
• American users prioritising freedom, flexibility, and personal empowerment.

This means that trust is not a linear outcome. Instead, people build trust using a mix of ethical beliefs and cultural norms, depending on what matters most to them and how they interpret the role of cryptocurrencies in their lives.

Business Implications

The findings carry significant implications for companies, regulators, and institutions operating in the cryptocurrency space.

1. Tailor trust-building strategies to cultural expectations.
What works in one country will not necessarily work in another. For example:

• China: emphasise autonomy, privacy protection, and long-term value.
• Germany: highlight security, compliance, and predictability.
• US: focus on empowerment, flexibility, and freedom of choice.

2. Adapt security and communication strategies to local trust dynamics.
Platforms can build trust by clearly communicating risk-mitigation features such as transaction guarantees, stringent KYC verification, and traceability audits. Messaging should also emphasize long-term reliability, compliance with institutional norms, and sustainability objectives,

3. Strengthen privacy and cybersecurity features.
Users across all markets remain wary of hacks, data leaks, and traceability. Firms that invest in strong, transparent privacy protections will be better positioned to win user confidence.

4 Link crypto products to financial well-being.
Whether through lower remittance costs, easier cross-border payments, or long-term portfolio value, users trust crypto more when they see clear personal financial benefits.

5. Avoid a one-size-fits-all approach to regulation and adoption.
Regulators and institutions should recognise that trust is culturally shaped. Policies designed with local values and ethical expectations in mind will gain greater public acceptance.

 

Authors & Sources

Authors: Arif Perdana (Monash University), W. Eric Lee (University of Northern Iowa), Chu Yeong Lim (Nanyang Technological University), Gary Pan (Singapore Management University), Poh-Sun Seow (Singapore Management University)

Original Article: Telematics and Informatics

---