ISSN (print): 1793-7248
ISSN (online): 1793-9631
- Centre for Chinese Language and Culture, School of Humanities, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- Chinese Heritage Centre, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- Center for Chinese Entrepreneur Studies, Tsinghua University, China
- Global Publishing, an imprint of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore
The International Journal of Diasporic Chinese Studies (IJDCS) released its inaugural issue in June 2009, jointly published by the Centre for Chinese Language and Culture, Nanyang Technological University; Centre for Chinese Studies, University of Manchester; Centre for Overseas Chinese Research, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (renamed Center for International Migration and Overseas Chinese Research in 2015); and Global Publishing (renamed Global Publishing, an imprint of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. in October 2010). In 2014, the Centre for Chinese Migration Studies, University of Nottingham joins the publishing team. In end of 2016, Center for Chinese Entrepreneur Studies, Tsinghua University, joins as one of the journal's co-publishers. The journal publication team restructured during 2018-2019 and the current the journal is jointly published by Centre for Chinese Language and Culture, Nanyang Technological University; Chinese Heritage Centre, Nanyang Technological University; Center for Chinese Entrepreneur Studies, Tsinghua University; Global Publishing, an imprint of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
IJDCS is a biannual journal, comprising four columns: "Academic Articles"; Research Notes"; "Academic Activities Reports " and "Book Reviews". The Journal has its objective set on fostering the originality, multiplicity, and novelty in the studies of Chinese diaspora. It welcomes scholars from all disciplines across the world to submit and publish academic articles and research discussions, with Chinese diaspora as the subject of study. The topics include the phenomena of diasporic Chinese as an individual and a collective, their experiences and situations in the places of residence, their activities transcending regional and international boundaries, as well as their relations and connections with China. The contributing authors can adopt methodology respectively from humanities, social sciences, and even science and technology, or employ multidisciplinary approach to address the topics pertaining to Chinese diaspora. The journal will engage scholars to review the manuscripts submitted for publication. In addition, the journal also introduces to the Chinese readers the important publications and major academic activities from various languages in order to enhance scholarly exchange and investigation in the diasporic Chinese studies.
LIU Hong (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)
LONG Denggao (Tsinghua University, China)
YOW Cheun Hoe (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)
ZHANG Huimei (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)
XING Jinghua (Tsinghua University, China)
ZENG Yajun (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)
WANG Gungwu (East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore)
Gregor BENTON (Cardiff University, United Kingdom)
Takeshi HAMASHITA (Sun Yat-sen University, China)
TAN Chee Beng (Sun Yat-sen University, China)
Danny WONG Tze Ken (University of Malaya, Malaysia)
Leo SURYADINATA (ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore)
PHUA Kok Khoo (National University of Singapore & Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)
David Der-wei WANG (Harvard University, United States of America)
YEN Ching-hwang (University of Adelaide, Australia)
GAO Jia (The University of Melbourne, Australia)
GUO Shibao (University of Calgary, Canada)
HUANG Jianli (National University of Singapore, Singapore)
LI Anshan (Peking University, China)
LI Minghuan (Xiamen University, China)
YI Junghee (Incheon National University, South Korea)
LAI Chi Kong (The University of Queensland, Australia)
LIAO Chiyang (Musashino Art University, Japan)
LIU Jin (Wuyi University, China)
LIU Yipeng (University of Reading, United Kingdom)
James K. CHIN (Jinan University, China)
Caroline Sy HAU (Kyoto University, Japan)
SHU Changsheng (University of São Paulo, Brazil)
Michael SZONYI (Harvard University, United States of America)
WU Qianjin (Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, China)
ZHANG Zhenjiang (Jinan University, China)
ZHOU Min (University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America)
ZHUANG Guotu (Xiamen University, China)
Peer review policy of The International Journal of Diasporic Chinese Studies follows is modifiy from the peer reivew policy of the journal's co-publisher, Global Publishing, an imprint of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., for better clarity. For original peer review policy, please access: https://www.worldscientific.com/page/authors/peer-review-policy
We are committed to prompt evaluation and publication of fully accepted papers in The International Journal of Diasporic Chinese Studies. To maintain a high-quality publication, all submissions undergo a rigorous double blind review process. Characteristics of the peer review process are as follows:
- Simultaneous submissions of the same manuscript to different journals will not be tolerated.
- Manuscripts with contents outside the scope will not be considered for review.
- All submissions will be refereed by 2 experts as suggested by the editorial board without providing any information that may conclude the author's identity. Should there be different opioions between 2 experts, additional review from the third expert will be carry out.
- In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. Authors will be informed when Editors decide further review is required.
- All publication decisions are made by the journal's Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the referees' reports. Authors of papers that are not accepted are notified promptly.
- All submitted manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. We expect our Board of Reviewing Editors and reviewers to treat manuscripts as confidential material as well.
- Editors and reviewers involved in the review process should disclose conflicts of interest resulting from direct competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, and remove oneself from cases in which such conflicts preclude an objective evaluation. Privileged information or ideas that are obtained through peer review must not be used for competitive gain.
- Our peer review process is confidential and identities of reviewers cannot be revealed.
The journal's co-publisher, Global Publishing, an imprint of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. is a member of CrossCheck. All manuscripts submitted will be checked for plagiarism (copying text or results from other sources) and self-plagiarism (duplicating substantial parts of authors' own published work without giving the appropriate references) using the CrossCheck database. Plagiarism is not tolerated.
For more information about CrossCheck/iThenticate, please visit http://www.crossref.org/crosscheck.html.
Ethical policy of The International Journal of Diasporic Chinese Studies follows is modifiy from the ethical policy of the journal's co-publisher, Global Publishing, an imprint of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., for better clarity. For original ethical policy, please access: https://www.worldscientific.com/page/journals/ethical-policy
The ethical policy of The International Journal of Diasporic Chinese Studies follows the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (http://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf).
Authors must be honest in presenting their results and conclusions of their research. Research misconduct is harmful for knowledge. It could mislead other researchers.
Fabrication, falsification or selective reporting of data with the intent to mislead or deceive is unethical, as is the theft of data or research results from others. The results of research should be recorded and maintained to allow for analysis and review. Following publication, the data should be retained for a reasonable period and made available upon request. Exceptions may be appropriate in certain circumstances in order to preserve privacy, to assure patent protection, or for similar reasons.
All those who have made a significant contribution should be given chance to be cited as authors. Other individuals who have contributed to the work should be acknowledged. Articles should include a full list of the current institutional affiliations of all authors, both academic and corporate.
Reproducing text from other papers without properly crediting the source (plagiarism) or producing many papers with almost the same content by the same authors (self-plagiarism) is not acceptable. Submitting the same results to more than one journal concurrently is unethical. Exceptions are the review articles. Authors may not present results obtained by others as if they were their own. Authors should acknowledge the work of others used in their research and cite publications that have influenced the direction and course of their study.
Simultaneous submissions of the same manuscript to different journals will not be tolerated. The submitted article will be removed without consideration.
Corrections and retractions
All authors have an obligation to inform and cooperate with journal editors to provide prompt retractions or correction of errors in published works.
- The journal will issue retractions if:
- There are clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error);
- The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication);
- It constitutes plagiarism;
- It reports unethical research.
- The journal will issue errata if:
- A small portion of an otherwise reliable publication proves to be misleading (especially because of honest error);
- The author list is incorrect (i.e. a deserving author has been omitted or somebody who does not meet authorship criteria has been included).
Other forms of misconduct include failure to meet clear ethical and legal requirements such as misrepresentation of interests, breach of confidentiality, lack of informed consent and abuse of research subjects or materials. Misconduct also includes improper dealing with infringements, such as attempts to cover up misconduct and reprisals on whistleblowers.
The primary responsibility for handling research misconduct is in the hands of those who employ the researchers. If a possible misconduct is brought to our attention, we will seek advice from the referees and the Editorial Board. If there is the evidence, we will resolve the matter by appropriate corrections in the printed and online journal; by refusing to consider an author's future work, for a given period, and by contacting affected authors and editors of other journals.
Minor misdemeanours may not lead to formal investigations, but are just as damaging given their probable frequency, and should be corrected by teachers and mentors.
World Scientific is a member of CrossCheck. All manuscripts submitted will be checked for plagiarism (copying text or results from other sources) and self-plagiarism (duplicating substantial parts of authors' own published work without giving the appropriate references) using the CrossCheck database. Plagiarism is not tolerated.
For more information about CrossCheck/iThenticate, please visit http://www.crossref.org/crosscheck.html.
Human and Animal Rights
If the work involves the use of human subjects, the author should ensure that the work described has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans; Uniform Requirements for manuscripts submitted to Biomedical journals. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.
All animal experiments should comply with the ARRIVE guidelines and should be carried out in accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986 and associated guidelines, EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments, or the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of Laboratory animals (NIH Publications No. 8023, revised 1978) and the authors should clearly indicate in the manuscript that such guidelines have been followed.
Clinical Trial Results
In line with the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, the journal will not consider results posted in the same clinical trials registry in which primary registration resides to be prior publication if the results posted are presented in the form of a brief structured (less than 500 words) abstract or table. However, divulging results in other circumstances (e.g., investors' meetings) is discouraged and may jeopardise consideration of the manuscript. Authors should fully disclose all posting in registries of results of the same or closely related work.
Reporting Clinical Trials
Randomized controlled trials should be presented according to the CONSORT guidelines. At manuscript submission, authors must provide the CONSORT checklist accompanied by a flow diagram that illustrates the progress of patients through the trial, including recruitment, enrollment, randomization, withdrawal and completion, and a detailed description of the randomization procedure. The CONSORT checklist and template flow diagram are available online.
Registration of Clinical Trials
Registration in a public trials registry is a condition for publication of clinical trials in this journal in accordance with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors recommendations. Trials must register at or before the onset of patient enrolment. The clinical trial registration number should be included at the end of the abstract of the article. A clinical trial is defined as any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or more health-related interventions to evaluate the effects of health outcomes. Health-related interventions include any intervention used to modify a biomedical or health-related outcome (for example drugs, surgical procedures, devices, behavioural treatments, dietary interventions, and process-of-care changes). Health outcomes include any biomedical or health-related measures obtained in patients or participants, including pharmacokinetic measures and adverse events. Purely observational studies (those in which the assignment of the medical intervention is not at the discretion of the investigator) will not require registration.